H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Jim Courier H2H: 4-0
Alex Corretja holds a 4–0 lead over Jim Courier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1999 Stuttgart Masters third round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1998* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(11) 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1994* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |