H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 1-0
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2003 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(2) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2003* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(2) 7-6(7) | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |