H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1
Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 7-6(3) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Justin Gimelstob | 7-6(3) 6-2 6-3 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |