H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2003 Scottsdale quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-2 Alex Corretja #17 Match data Mar 8, 2003* QF Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Alex Corretja #11 7-6(2) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #7 Match data May 12, 2001* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Alex Corretja #7 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data Nov 27, 2000 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #17 6-0 6-0 6-1 Alex Corretja #30 Match data Jan 21, 2000* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-4 6-4 Alex Corretja #28 Match data Jan 15, 2000* SF Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25
26 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alex Corretja Lleyton Hewitt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
26 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
30 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3% — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Alex Corretja's and 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alex Corretja Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6%
18 1992 23/24 1.6 1.0 57.2% 62.8% 47.6% 54.5% 52.6% 56.3% 42.3% 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8%
19 1993 42/47 2.0 1.5 56.1% 66.8% 51.5% 60.5% 47.8% 59.6% 40.3% 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8%
20 1994 61/66 2.1 1.7 65.4% 66.6% 51.5% 56.3% 43.8% 60.9% 42.6% 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2%
21 1995 48/52 1.9 1.2 67.8% 63.4% 49.9% 56.6% 46.5% 59.1% 41.0% 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4%
22 1996 54/63 3.6 2.4 59.4% 69.1% 52.1% 53.2% 46.2% 62.0% 40.2% 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4%
23 1997 63/72 3.4 2.6 57.4% 72.3% 53.8% 59.2% 53.3% 64.2% 44.3% 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7%
24 1998 59/73 4.8 2.3 55.7% 71.9% 52.5% 58.9% 43.5% 63.3% 41.2% 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3%
25 1999 42/55 4.7 2.3 54.1% 71.2% 54.2% 58.2% 41.2% 63.2% 38.7% 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0%
26 2000 55/71 5.5 2.3 49.3% 76.1% 54.7% 62.1% 46.8% 65.4% 41.5% 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3%
27 2001 47/50 5.2 3.7 48.2% 70.7% 52.7% 57.3% 42.9% 61.2% 38.8% 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0%
28 2002 38/52 4.5 3.1 57.6% 71.7% 55.1% 59.4% 45.5% 64.6% 42.6% 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5%
29 2003 31/33 4.3 3.0 56.3% 68.0% 48.8% 56.4% 35.8% 59.8% 36.6% 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0%
30 2004 31/31 3.7 3.3 57.9% 68.2% 50.4% 62.4% 41.7% 60.7% 36.9% 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3%
31 2005 6/6 1.3 2.7 60.0% 58.1% 44.6% 55.1% 24.5% 54.5% 36.1% 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alex Corretja Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.28
18 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.41
19 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.06
20 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) — +1.18
21 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.87
22 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.40
23 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32
24 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.18
25 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.55
26 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.23
27 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01
28 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -1.75
29 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.34
30 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.11
31 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.31
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.96
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04
Career — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56 — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.