H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2003 Scottsdale quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 2003* Scottsdale ATP 250 QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-4 6-2 Alex Corretja #17 Match data
May 12, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Alex Corretja #11 7-6(2) 6-4 Lleyton Hewitt #7 Match data
Nov 27, 2000 Masters Cup ATP Finals RR Hard Alex Corretja #7 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Lleyton Hewitt #6 Match data
Jan 21, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #17 6-0 6-0 6-1 Alex Corretja #30 Match data
Jan 15, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #21 6-4 6-4 Alex Corretja #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30