H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Marcos Ondruska H2H: 1-1
Alex Corretja and Marcos Ondruska are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay, while Marcos Ondruska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Ondruska won the 1995 Miami Masters second round 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcos Ondruska | 6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1993* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-4 6-3 | Marcos Ondruska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Marcos Ondruska | #1,352 | #27 | 1,007 | 1,785 | 105 | 137 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Marcos Ondruska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #67 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #47 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #114 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #102 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |