Alex Corretja
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | 8 | 7 | 15 | May 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 7 | 12 | Apr 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 7 | 4 | 11 | Oct 9, 2003 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Alberto Berasategui | 7 | 3 | 10 | Apr 19, 2000 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Alex Corretja holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1999 Long Island round of 16 6-1 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Aug 27, 1999* | R16 | Long Island | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Alex Corretja | 6-2 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Mar 17, 1999* | R64 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 1,998 | 417 | 278 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 17 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alex Corretja | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #8 | 1,933 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,649 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Alex Corretja | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1992 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 24 | 20 | 44 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 39 | 18 | 57 | 68.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1995 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 24 | 19 | 43 | 55.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1996 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1997 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 38 | 9 | 47 | 80.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1998 | 24 | 8 | 32 | 75.0% | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1999 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 2000 | 27 | 12 | 39 | 69.2% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 2001 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 2002 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 2003 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2004 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 133 | 104 | 237 | 56.1% | 271 | 144 | 415 | 65.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 10 | 23 | 33 | 30.3% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Alex Corretja | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1992 | 1567 | 127.1 | -2.60 | +0.75 | 0.968 | 49.4% | +6 | +8 | — | 46.6% | -0.05 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–5 (38%) | 101.4 | +1.54 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1993 | 1658 | 141.2 | -0.53 | +1.13 | 0.997 | 50.2% | -123 | +64 | — | 50.0% | +0.33 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–10 (29%) | 99.4 | -1.01 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1994 | 1849 | 150.0 | +0.83 | +3.51 | 1.089 | 51.6% | -259 | +60 | — | 58.1% | +0.50 | 23–10 (70%) | 12–11 (52%) | 107.8 | -2.60 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1995 | 1727 | 136.5 | -1.41 | +2.29 | 1.002 | 50.0% | -169 | +65 | — | 52.4% | +0.15 | 6–11 (35%) | 5–6 (45%) | 92.6 | -0.97 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1996 | 1784 | 149.2 | +0.51 | +2.14 | 1.060 | 50.8% | -86 | +90 | -150 | 55.3% | +0.47 | 10–4 (71%) | 6–14 (30%) | 102.9 | -1.11 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1997 | 1840 | 154.1 | +2.24 | +5.27 | 1.237 | 54.3% | -146 | +167 | — | 65.9% | +1.20 | 9–10 (47%) | 9–8 (53%) | 93.9 | -0.17 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1998 | 1963 | 157.7 | +1.53 | +2.59 | 1.122 | 52.2% | -34 | +97 | — | 63.7% | +0.90 | 21–6 (78%) | 19–14 (58%) | 109.6 | +0.17 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1999 | 1771 | 145.8 | +1.50 | +0.88 | 1.054 | 51.0% | +5 | +184 | — | 55.6% | +0.48 | 16–8 (67%) | 12–16 (43%) | 97.4 | +1.15 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 2000 | 1933 | 161.5 | +3.18 | +4.08 | 1.199 | 53.1% | -19 | +143 | — | 68.0% | +1.14 | 13–6 (68%) | 20–10 (67%) | 109.2 | -1.65 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 2001 | 1781 | 141.6 | -0.54 | +1.48 | 1.001 | 50.1% | -24 | +247 | — | 57.9% | +0.20 | 11–9 (55%) | 17–7 (71%) | 98.8 | -0.84 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 2002 | 1851 | 149.1 | +1.45 | +3.39 | 1.201 | 53.3% | -106 | +256 | — | 66.2% | +0.99 | 7–9 (44%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.5 | +0.91 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 2003 | 1650 | 130.9 | -1.00 | -0.14 | 0.912 | 48.2% | +41 | +144 | — | 36.3% | -0.62 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–9 (40%) | 94.6 | +0.20 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 2004 | 1623 | 126.5 | -2.17 | -0.03 | 0.939 | 48.9% | +17 | +95 | — | 43.7% | -0.35 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.8 | +0.64 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 2005 | 1572 | 105.8 | -2.46 | -1.57 | 0.794 | 45.4% | — | +73 | — | 9.1% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.16 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| Career | 1998 | 152.9 | +0.52 | +2.39 | 1.070 | 51.3% | -50 | +121 | -150 | 57.3% | +0.52 | 139–94 (60%) | 128–125 (51%) | 100.4 | -0.56 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | 8 | 7 | 15 | May 5, 2004 | H2H |
| Carlos Moya | 5 | 7 | 12 | Apr 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Marc Rosset | 7 | 4 | 11 | Oct 9, 2003 | H2H |
| Marcelo Rios | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Alberto Berasategui | 7 | 3 | 10 | Apr 19, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |