H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 1-3
Patrick Rafter holds a 3–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Miami Masters fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-4 6-3 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Mar 17, 2001* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2000* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Patrick Rafter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |