H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Petr Korda H2H: 1-0
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1996 Indian Wells Masters second round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Petr Korda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Petr Korda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 |