H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-0
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1996 Indianapolis fourth round 6-3 6-7(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1996 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Richey Reneberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |