H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-2
Sargis Sargsian holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sargis Sargsian leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 2004 US Open first round 2-6 6-4 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 2-6 6-4 6-0 6-1 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2003* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sargis Sargsian | 7-5 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |