H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-1
Alex Corretja and Sebastien Lareau are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 1998 Moscow fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1998* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sebastien Lareau | 6-3 6-3 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1997* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-1 7-5 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |