H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Shuzo Matsuoka H2H: 0-1
Shuzo Matsuoka holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuzo Matsuoka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shuzo Matsuoka won the 1996 Nottingham fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Shuzo Matsuoka | 6-4 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Shuzo Matsuoka | #1,299 | #46 | 717 | 1,821 | 127 | 152 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Shuzo Matsuoka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #691 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #181 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #144 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #124 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1996 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #148 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #534 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1324 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |