H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 1-3
Stefan Edberg holds a 3–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 3–0 on clay, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1996 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1996* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Stefan Edberg | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Alex Corretja | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Stefan Edberg | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stefan Edberg | 6-1 7-5 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| May 1, 1993* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Stefan Edberg | 6-3 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Stefan Edberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |