H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-2
Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1998 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1997* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Alex Corretja | 6-3 7-5 | Tim Henman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |