H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 0-2
Todd Woodbridge holds a 2–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Woodbridge leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1995 Indianapolis second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1995 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 6-1 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-2 6-2 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |