H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-0

Alex Corretja holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1995 Chile Open round of 16 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alex Corretja #40 7-5 7-5 Tomas Carbonell #72 Match data Oct 27, 1995* R16 Chile Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alex Corretja #47 6-0 2-6 7-6(5) Tomas Carbonell #65 Match data Apr 29, 1994* R16 Madrid ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1
26 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alex Corretja Tomas Carbonell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3% — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Alex Corretja's and 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alex Corretja Tomas Carbonell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 23/24 1.6 1.0 57.2% 62.8% 47.6% 54.5% 52.6% 56.3% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 42/47 2.0 1.5 56.1% 66.8% 51.5% 60.5% 47.8% 59.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 61/66 2.1 1.7 65.4% 66.6% 51.5% 56.3% 43.8% 60.9% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 48/52 1.9 1.2 67.8% 63.4% 49.9% 56.6% 46.5% 59.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 54/63 3.6 2.4 59.4% 69.1% 52.1% 53.2% 46.2% 62.0% 40.2% 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2%
23 1997 63/72 3.4 2.6 57.4% 72.3% 53.8% 59.2% 53.3% 64.2% 44.3% 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3%
24 1998 59/73 4.8 2.3 55.7% 71.9% 52.5% 58.9% 43.5% 63.3% 41.2% 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4%
25 1999 42/55 4.7 2.3 54.1% 71.2% 54.2% 58.2% 41.2% 63.2% 38.7% 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8%
26 2000 55/71 5.5 2.3 49.3% 76.1% 54.7% 62.1% 46.8% 65.4% 41.5% 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6%
27 2001 47/50 5.2 3.7 48.2% 70.7% 52.7% 57.3% 42.9% 61.2% 38.8% 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4%
28 2002 38/52 4.5 3.1 57.6% 71.7% 55.1% 59.4% 45.5% 64.6% 42.6% 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0%
29 2003 31/33 4.3 3.0 56.3% 68.0% 48.8% 56.4% 35.8% 59.8% 36.6% 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4%
30 2004 31/31 3.7 3.3 57.9% 68.2% 50.4% 62.4% 41.7% 60.7% 36.9% 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3%
31 2005 6/6 1.3 2.7 60.0% 58.1% 44.6% 55.1% 24.5% 54.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 3.7 2.3 57.3% 69.5% 52.2% 58.1% 45.2% 61.9% 40.8% — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alex Corretja Tomas Carbonell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40
18 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21
19 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60
20 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
21 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63
22 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85
23 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61
24 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48
25 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63
26 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06
27 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23
28 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37
29 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
30 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25
31 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56 — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.