H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-1
Alex Corretja holds a 2–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Gstaad fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2000* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-2 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1999* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Alex Corretja | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1994* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vincent Spadea | 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Alex Corretja | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |