H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 4-4

Alex Corretja and Wayne Ferreira are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 3–2 on clay, while Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Paris Masters fourth round 6-3 6-4.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 18, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Alex Corretja #8 6-3 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #11 Match data
Oct 24, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Alex Corretja #7 6-3 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #29 Match data
Jun 4, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Alex Corretja #25 6-4 7-5 6-2 Wayne Ferreira #8 Match data
May 20, 1995* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Wayne Ferreira #6 6-3 6-4 Alex Corretja #29 Match data
May 6, 1995* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Wayne Ferreira #12 6-3 2-6 6-4 Alex Corretja #30 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Indianapolis ATP 250 SF Hard Wayne Ferreira #15 6-1 6-2 Alex Corretja #43 Match data
Apr 21, 1994* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Alex Corretja #46 6-3 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #19 Match data
May 21, 1993* Bologna ATP 250 R16 Clay Wayne Ferreira #15 3-6 6-3 6-4 Alex Corretja #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15