H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alex de Minaur vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 2-0
Alex de Minaur holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex de Minaur leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex de Minaur won the 2022 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2022* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alex de Minaur | 6-2 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alex de Minaur | 6-4 6-2 6-7(7) 4-6 6-3 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex de Minaur | #5 | #5 | 4,250 | 2,117 | 298 | 174 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex de Minaur | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #208 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #31 | 1,851 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 1,956 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #24 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,967 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #7 | 2,003 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,924 | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |