H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex de Minaur vs Milos Raonic H2H: 3-0
Alex de Minaur holds a 3–0 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alex de Minaur leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alex de Minaur won the 2024 S Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2024* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Alex de Minaur | 7-5 6-2 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alex de Minaur | 6-7(6) 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2018* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alex de Minaur | 6-4 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex de Minaur | #5 | #5 | 4,250 | 2,117 | 298 | 174 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex de Minaur | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #208 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #31 | 1,851 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 1,956 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2020 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2021 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #24 | 1,931 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2023 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,967 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2024 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2025 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #7 | 2,003 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2026 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,924 | 0 | 11 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |