H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Alexander Bublik vs Egor Gerasimov H2H: 1-0
Alexander Bublik holds a 1–0 lead over Egor Gerasimov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Bublik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexander Bublik won the 2021 Eastbourne fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Belarus
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2021* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Alexander Bublik | 6-2 6-2 | Egor Gerasimov | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2016 | Moscow | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Alexander Bublik | 7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 | Egor Gerasimov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Bublik | #11 | #10 | 3,445 | 2,065 | 200 | 174 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Egor Gerasimov | #780 | #65 | 950 | 1,817 | 44 | 52 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Bublik | Egor Gerasimov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #162 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #50 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #36 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #157 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #32 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #33 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #78 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #11 | 2,002 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #113 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #11 | 1,881 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |