H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alexander Bublik vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-1
Alexander Bublik and Jack Sock are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexander Bublik leads 1–0 on grass, while Jack Sock leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Bublik won the 2022 Newport fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Alexander Bublik | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jack Sock | 7-6(3) 6-7(2) 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Alexander Bublik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Bublik | #11 | #10 | 3,445 | 2,065 | 200 | 174 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Bublik | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #162 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #50 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #36 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2022 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2023 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #32 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #33 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #11 | 2,002 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #11 | 1,881 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |