H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Bublik vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-1
Alexander Bublik holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on clay, while Alexander Bublik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexander Bublik won the 2021 Queen's Club third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Kazakhstan
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2021* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Alexander Bublik | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2021* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-4 0-6 7-5 | Alexander Bublik | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2021* | Antalya | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Alexander Bublik | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Bublik | #11 | #10 | 3,445 | 2,065 | 200 | 174 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Bublik | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #162 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #50 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–28 | 54.1% | #36 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #32 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #33 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #11 | 2,002 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #11 | 1,881 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |