H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Peya vs Ramon Delgado H2H: 1-0
Alexander Peya holds a 1–0 lead over Ramon Delgado in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexander Peya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexander Peya won the 2006 Beijing third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | US Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Ramon Delgado | 6-7(5) 7-6(11) 6-3 | Alexander Peya | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2006* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alexander Peya | 6-4 6-2 | Ramon Delgado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Peya | #1,044 | #92 | 622 | 1,692 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ramon Delgado | #518 | #52 | 829 | 1,712 | 69 | 102 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Peya | Ramon Delgado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #187 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #149 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #257 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #135 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #92 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #187 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #147 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #269 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |