H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexander Volkov vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 3-1
Alexander Volkov holds a 3–1 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Alexander Volkov leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexander Volkov won the 1992 Paris Masters third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 6-4 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alexander Volkov | 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1991* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Emilio Sanchez | 6-1 7-5 | Alexander Volkov | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1990* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Alexander Volkov | 7-5 6-3 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Volkov | #1,324 | #14 | 1,538 | 1,921 | 291 | 245 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Volkov | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1968 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #529 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1989 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #50 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1990 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #24 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1991 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1992 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,825 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1993 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #18 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1994 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1996 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #98 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #195 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |