H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alexander Zverev vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-2
Milos Raonic holds a 2–1 lead over Alexander Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexander Zverev leads 1–0 on clay, while Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2019 Australian Open fourth round 6-1 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 29
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-1 6-1 7-6(5) | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Milos Raonic | 4-6 7-5 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Alexander Zverev | Match data |
| May 20, 2017* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Alexander Zverev | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | #2 | #2 | 8,480 | 2,248 | 528 | 215 | 71.1% | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 24 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexander Zverev | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #83 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #24 | 2,013 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #4 | 2,052 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #4 | 2,125 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2019 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2020 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #7 | 2,128 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2021 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,242 | 0 | 18 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2022 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #12 | 2,165 | 0 | 18 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2023 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #7 | 2,094 | 0 | 20 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2024 | 61–18 | 77.2% | #2 | 2,135 | 0 | 22 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2025 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,040 | 0 | 23 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2026 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #2 | 2,170 | 1 | 24 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |