H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Donald Young H2H: 1-2
Donald Young holds a 2–1 lead over Alexandr Dolgopolov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Donald Young leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2016 Canada Masters second round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Donald Young | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-4 6-4 | Donald Young | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2015* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Donald Young | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Donald Young | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |