H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-3
Ernests Gulbis holds a 3–1 lead over Alexandr Dolgopolov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2015 Nice fourth round 7-5 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2015* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| May 7, 2014* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 6-3 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-2 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 6-1 6-4 | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alexandr Dolgopolov | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |