H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Alexandr Dolgopolov vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-5

Jeremy Chardy holds a 5–2 lead over Alexandr Dolgopolov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2014 Valencia round of 16 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alexandr Dolgopolov
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #34 3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 Alexandr Dolgopolov #24 Match data Oct 24, 2014* R16 Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Alexandr Dolgopolov #38 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #46 Match data Feb 27, 2014* R16 Mexican Open ATP 500 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #45 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) Alexandr Dolgopolov #53 Match data Feb 14, 2014* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #31 7-5 7-6(5) 6-7(3) 7-6(5) Alexandr Dolgopolov #56 Match data Jan 16, 2014* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Alexandr Dolgopolov #20 6-3 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #31 Match data Oct 9, 2012* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #133 6-3 7-6(6) Alexandr Dolgopolov #17 Match data Oct 21, 2011* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #59 6-1 5-7 6-2 Alexandr Dolgopolov #55 Match data Oct 13, 2010* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alexandr Dolgopolov #508 #13 2,030 2,017 215 200 51.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 0–1 0.0% #265 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 0–1 0.0% #233 1,434 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2009 1–1 50.0% #131 1,520 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2010 21–23 47.7% #48 1,776 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2011 38–29 56.7% #15 1,847 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,891 0 2 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2013 21–26 44.7% #57 1,806 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2014 27–22 55.1% #23 1,869 0 2 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2015 25–26 49.0% #36 1,824 0 2 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2016 17–18 48.6% #62 1,773 0 2 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #38 1,905 0 3 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2018 5–5 50.0% #260 1,881 0 3 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2011 22 16 38 57.9% 15 10 25 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2012 26 17 43 60.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2013 13 16 29 44.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2017 13 14 27 48.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2018 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 130 119 249 52.2% 62 61 123 50.4% 23 20 43 53.5% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 412/415 of Alexandr Dolgopolov's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 1/1 5.0 1.0 58.1% 66.7% 46.2% 50.0% 33.3% 58.1% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1/1 1.0 3.0 33.3% 69.2% 34.6% 33.3% — 46.2% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2009 2/2 4.5 1.0 67.4% 71.9% 46.2% 33.3% 100.0% 63.5% 37.7% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2010 44/44 8.6 2.8 54.8% 73.2% 52.7% 62.5% 41.3% 63.8% 35.6% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2011 67/67 8.3 3.1 50.5% 75.8% 51.3% 52.9% 43.4% 63.7% 37.4% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2012 59/59 7.8 2.2 53.5% 75.6% 52.5% 60.2% 42.4% 64.8% 37.4% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2013 46/47 6.9 2.7 52.5% 75.7% 51.2% 49.2% 40.6% 64.0% 36.3% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2014 48/49 8.5 2.1 54.6% 76.0% 52.8% 61.5% 42.1% 65.3% 37.9% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2015 51/51 7.0 2.8 58.6% 74.8% 52.9% 57.8% 44.6% 65.7% 38.1% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2016 34/35 7.3 3.4 57.0% 73.0% 51.4% 58.1% 42.8% 63.4% 36.3% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2017 49/49 6.5 2.8 56.2% 74.7% 52.3% 58.7% 41.2% 64.9% 35.6% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2018 10/10 8.2 4.5 54.8% 72.1% 48.2% 59.3% 43.7% 61.3% 38.7% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 412/415 7.6 2.8 54.5% 74.9% 52.0% 57.3% 42.6% 64.3% 36.9% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alexandr Dolgopolov Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2006 1485 99.0 -1.68 -6.75 0.704 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1435 100.2 -3.07 -1.78 0.371 32.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1471 106.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2009 1520 105.1 -1.33 +0.32 1.031 50.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.21 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2010 1777 143.2 +0.74 -0.39 0.984 49.7% -65 -104 -134 52.7% -0.15 7–13 (35%) 12–7 (63%) 100.7 -0.67 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2011 1847 155.9 +1.19 +0.46 1.032 50.5% +3 +12 -247 52.4% +0.17 13–4 (76%) 9–13 (41%) 106.6 +1.13 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2012 1892 158.6 +2.38 +0.43 1.061 50.7% +13 -26 -289 56.1% +0.44 12–12 (50%) 11–13 (46%) 96.9 +1.58 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2013 1807 149.8 +1.10 +0.15 1.008 50.0% +21 -54 -150 45.5% -0.26 4–7 (36%) 11–10 (52%) 97.2 +0.43 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2014 1869 166.5 +1.67 +2.37 1.091 51.3% +22 -42 -84 55.8% +0.39 7–10 (41%) 15–12 (56%) 99.1 -1.81 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2015 1824 155.6 +1.13 +2.28 1.110 51.4% 0 +16 -9 52.0% +0.32 8–11 (42%) 9–16 (36%) 92.9 +0.29 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2016 1773 148.1 -0.13 +0.66 0.994 49.8% +20 +75 +20 52.4% -0.05 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 98.6 +0.05 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2017 1905 157.7 +1.25 +0.29 1.012 50.3% -16 -27 -148 56.6% +0.20 4–6 (40%) 12–5 (71%) 101.1 -3.41 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2018 1881 139.9 -0.71 +0.84 1.001 50.2% +15 — — 55.6% +0.07 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.9 -0.78 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2017 158.3 +1.17 +0.76 1.034 50.5% +2 -22 -105 52.8% +0.13 61–72 (46%) 91–82 (53%) 98.2 -0.70 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.