H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Blaz Kavcic H2H: 0-1
Blaz Kavcic holds a 1–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Blaz Kavcic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Blaz Kavcic won the 2013 Zagreb third round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2013* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Blaz Kavcic | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Blaz Kavcic | #1,195 | #68 | 685 | 1,810 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Blaz Kavcic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #112 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #92 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #94 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #105 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #151 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #97 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #206 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |