H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Gerald Melzer H2H: 1-0
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Gerald Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 36
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Gerald Melzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gerald Melzer | #1,610 | #68 | 728 | 1,674 | 16 | 30 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Gerald Melzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #166 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #68 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |