H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Aljaz Bedene vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2015 Chennai round of 32 7-6(0) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Aljaz Bedene
SLO Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Aljaz Bedene #56 6-2 6-3 Lukas Lacko #102 Match data May 14, 2017* Q1 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Aljaz Bedene #156 7-6(0) 6-3 Lukas Lacko #88 Match data Jan 8, 2015* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard
Lukas Lacko #119 6-2 6-0 Aljaz Bedene #163 Match data Jan 17, 2012* Q2 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Aljaz Bedene #1,030 #43 1,169 1,893 131 160 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Aljaz Bedene Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #165 1,598 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2012 3–4 42.9% #86 1,627 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2013 11–18 37.9% #95 1,631 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2014 5–9 35.7% #145 1,671 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2015 17–17 50.0% #45 1,777 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2016 12–19 38.7% #101 1,740 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2017 19–18 51.4% #49 1,816 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2018 17–19 47.2% #67 1,733 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2019 18–18 50.0% #58 1,844 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2020 10–12 45.5% #58 1,798 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2021 15–15 50.0% #109 1,773 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #347 1,660 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Aljaz Bedene Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2012 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2015 10 10 20 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 6 10 16 37.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 2 7 9 22.2% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 8 11 19 42.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 6 5 11 54.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 57 74 131 43.5% 61 64 125 48.8% 13 22 35 37.1% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 290/291 of Aljaz Bedene's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Aljaz Bedene Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2011 2/2 9.0 2.5 60.2% 81.9% 49.2% 42.9% 33.3% 69.0% 28.3% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2012 7/7 5.6 3.6 56.4% 71.7% 41.5% 62.9% 49.7% 57.7% 34.3% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2013 29/29 7.9 3.7 57.4% 72.6% 50.5% 49.4% 43.5% 62.9% 36.7% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2014 14/14 8.8 3.1 53.1% 71.5% 45.5% 45.9% 48.1% 59.5% 33.9% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2015 34/34 8.1 2.9 54.0% 76.1% 48.8% 58.9% 43.1% 63.5% 35.6% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2016 31/31 9.1 2.9 57.4% 73.7% 49.6% 55.2% 42.1% 63.3% 35.5% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2017 37/37 7.9 2.0 59.3% 73.4% 52.1% 55.4% 40.6% 64.8% 36.3% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2018 36/36 8.1 2.2 57.6% 72.3% 49.3% 59.6% 32.0% 62.3% 37.5% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2019 35/36 9.4 3.2 57.1% 74.2% 49.1% 59.0% 45.0% 63.9% 35.1% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2020 22/22 9.4 3.7 56.7% 77.7% 45.9% 56.2% 31.1% 64.3% 30.5% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2021 30/30 8.2 3.6 54.2% 75.6% 50.8% 54.9% 41.8% 64.1% 36.6% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2022 13/13 8.7 4.8 54.8% 72.7% 45.1% 58.4% 39.4% 60.0% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 290/291 8.4 3.0 56.5% 74.1% 49.1% 55.9% 40.7% 63.2% 35.4% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Aljaz Bedene Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2010 1510 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2011 1598 111.4 -3.13 +1.53 0.912 49.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.14 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2012 1628 112.4 -0.63 -2.09 0.811 46.5% +15 -14 — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.05 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2013 1631 135.7 -0.57 -0.46 0.989 49.7% -24 +25 -80 43.4% -0.46 3–9 (25%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.37 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2014 1671 125.5 -2.62 -1.76 0.838 46.8% +7 +10 — 29.4% -1.21 4–2 (67%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.18 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2015 1777 143.0 -0.50 -0.29 0.974 49.4% +5 -47 -158 45.2% -0.30 7–2 (78%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.03 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2016 1740 139.8 -0.05 -0.03 0.968 49.2% +1 -8 -110 41.0% -0.41 6–8 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.06 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2017 1816 141.4 +0.23 +0.59 1.031 49.9% -96 -15 -84 50.6% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.31 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2018 1733 146.7 -0.98 +1.27 0.996 49.7% -89 +112 -31 46.8% -0.17 9–9 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.19 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2019 1844 145.1 +0.02 -0.45 0.970 49.6% -71 -22 -134 51.6% -0.02 6–7 (46%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.41 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1799 141.8 +0.66 -2.51 0.855 47.5% -20 +2 — 46.3% -0.15 4–1 (80%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.46 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2021 1774 129.1 +0.73 -0.73 1.019 50.0% -1 -14 -65 49.4% -0.03 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.98 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2022 1661 118.5 -2.51 -2.70 0.811 46.8% +31 +88 — 36.6% -0.76 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.07 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1893 144.0 -0.36 -0.42 0.960 49.1% -29 +18 -94 45.4% -0.25 53–52 (50%) 66–68 (49%) 101.6 -1.13 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.