H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Nikola Cacic H2H: 0-1
Nikola Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Aljaz Bedene in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikola Cacic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikola Cacic won the 2016 Umag third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2016* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nikola Cacic | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nikola Cacic | #1,516 | #281 | 161 | 1,505 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Nikola Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #533 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |