H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Aljaz Bedene vs Nikola Milojevic H2H: 1-0
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Nikola Milojevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2020 Roland Garros second round 7-5 2-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 7-5 2-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Nikola Milojevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nikola Milojevic | #1,425 | #125 | 582 | 1,650 | 5 | 7 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aljaz Bedene | Nikola Milojevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |