H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Allan Stone vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-4
Rod Laver holds a 4–0 lead over Allan Stone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rod Laver leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1975 La Costa Wct final 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1975* | La Costa Wct | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Rod Laver | 6-2 6-2 | Allan Stone | Match data |
| May 4, 1972* | Las Vegas Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rod Laver | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Allan Stone | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1971* | Quebec Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rod Laver | 7-5 6-2 | Allan Stone | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1970* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Rod Laver | 4-6 6-2 6-1 6-2 | Allan Stone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Stone | #199 | #36 | 0 | 1,885 | 247 | 244 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Allan Stone | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 38–25 | 60.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 16–31 | 34.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1972 | 17–30 | 36.2% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1973 | 34–33 | 50.7% | #60 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1974 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #38 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1976 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1977 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | 1978 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | 1979 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |