H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Amos Mansdorf vs Eduardo Masso H2H: 0-1
Eduardo Masso holds a 1–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Masso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Masso won the 1988 Roland Garros first round 6-4 4-6 6-3 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Eduardo Masso | 6-4 4-6 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Eduardo Masso | #1,177 | #56 | 568 | 1,684 | 41 | 69 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amos Mansdorf | Eduardo Masso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #87 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #219 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |