H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anders Jarryd vs Chris Lewis H2H: 1-2
Chris Lewis holds a 2–1 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Chris Lewis leads 2–0 on clay, while Anders Jarryd leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Lewis won the 1982 Bordeaux fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1982* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Chris Lewis | 6-2 6-1 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| May 13, 1982* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Chris Lewis | 6-3 6-1 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1981* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Anders Jarryd | 6-1 6-2 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anders Jarryd | Chris Lewis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |