H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andre Agassi vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 5-5
Andre Agassi and Thomas Enqvist are tied 5–5 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Andre Agassi leads 5–3 on hard courts, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andre Agassi won the 2004 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5
–
5
10 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-0 6-3 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2003* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-7(8) 7-6(5) 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-4 7-5 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| May 3, 1998* | Munich | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Thomas Enqvist | 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-3 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1995* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-4 6-2 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andre Agassi | 6-1 6-3 | Thomas Enqvist | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1995* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Thomas Enqvist | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-7(3) 6-2 | Andre Agassi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Agassi | #413 | #1 | 5,652 | 2,241 | 836 | 268 | 75.7% | 8 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 59 |
| Thomas Enqvist | #548 | #4 | 2,693 | 2,013 | 422 | 281 | 60.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andre Agassi | Thomas Enqvist | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #25 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #231 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 60–11 | 84.5% | #3 | 2,061 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #63 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #7 | 1,954 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1990 | 43–10 | 81.1% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,961 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 63–22 | 74.1% | #7 | 1,982 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #9 | 1,972 | 1 | 17 | 1996 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,980 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1993 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #24 | 1,943 | 1 | 19 | 1997 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,873 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 1994 | 52–14 | 78.8% | #2 | 2,145 | 2 | 24 | 1998 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #22 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1995 | 71–9 | 88.8% | #2 | 2,183 | 3 | 31 | 1999 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #4 | 1,913 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1996 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #8 | 2,000 | 3 | 33 | 2000 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #9 | 1,906 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #110 | 1,833 | 3 | 33 | 2001 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1998 | 66–17 | 79.5% | #6 | 1,967 | 3 | 38 | 2002 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #44 | 1,792 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1999 | 63–13 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,118 | 5 | 43 | 2003 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #96 | 1,710 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 2000 | 36–15 | 70.6% | #6 | 1,973 | 6 | 44 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #72 | 1,627 | 0 | 19 |
| 31 | 2001 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #3 | 1,956 | 7 | 48 | 2005 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 19 |
| 32 | 2002 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #2 | 2,011 | 7 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 47–10 | 82.5% | #4 | 2,042 | 8 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2004 | 37–13 | 74.0% | #8 | 2,002 | 8 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2005 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,049 | 8 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2006 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #150 | 1,912 | 8 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |