H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Albert Montanes H2H: 0-2

Albert Montanes holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Montanes leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2002 Palermo round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Montanes #77 6-2 6-2 Andrea Gaudenzi #115 Match data Sep 26, 2002* R32 Palermo ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Montanes #62 6-3 6-0 Andrea Gaudenzi #52 Match data Feb 14, 2002* R32 Chile Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Albert Montanes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Albert Montanes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 529/544 of Albert Montanes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Albert Montanes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8%
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4%
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3%
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4%
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6%
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4%
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Albert Montanes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.7 -0.51
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 99.3 +0.28
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.10
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 -0.26
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) 97.8 -0.48
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +0.20
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 103.0 -0.96
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) 108.7 -0.51
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) 106.6 +1.21
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) 107.6 +1.82
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 98.8 +2.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -1.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 106.9 +0.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.62
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.8 +0.54
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.24
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.03
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) 106.4 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.