H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-2
Daniel Vacek holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Gaudenzi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1995 Paris Masters third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1995* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |