H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Andrea Gaudenzi vs Francisco Roig H2H: 2-0

Andrea Gaudenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Roig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1994 Madrid round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Francisco Roig
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #43 6-2 6-3 Francisco Roig #206 Match data Apr 28, 1994* R32 Madrid ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andrea Gaudenzi #182 5-7 6-2 6-1 Francisco Roig #150 Match data May 12, 1993* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Francisco Roig #889 #60 579 1,715 64 96 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Francisco Roig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #326 1,492 0 0
20 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0 1988 3–5 37.5% #251 1,497 0 0
21 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0 1989 6–7 46.2% #107 1,568 0 0
22 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0 1990 5–9 35.7% #122 1,575 0 0
23 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0 1991 9–11 45.0% #129 1,618 0 0
24 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1 1992 18–22 45.0% #72 1,574 0 0
25 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1 1993 6–14 30.0% #172 1,504 0 0
26 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1 1994 7–9 43.8% #156 1,542 0 0
27 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3 1995 0–3 0.0% #470 1,501 0 0
28 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3 1996 4–4 50.0% #116 1,562 0 0
29 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3 1997 3–7 30.0% #153 1,534 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1998 3–3 50.0% #333 1,574 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #798 1,563 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Francisco Roig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 12 14 26 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
26 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1% — 15 21 36 41.7% 43 68 111 38.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's and 114/124 of Francisco Roig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Francisco Roig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3% 1991 19/20 1.7 1.6 65.7% 64.1% 51.1% 54.7% 42.2% 58.9% 42.8%
24 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5% 1992 38/40 1.6 3.2 61.2% 61.8% 46.9% 47.8% 42.1% 55.7% 43.3%
25 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4% 1993 17/20 1.8 3.0 56.7% 54.9% 44.7% 39.6% 47.2% 50.4% 38.9%
26 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1% 1994 15/16 2.1 2.6 51.6% 66.5% 48.6% 54.4% 48.9% 57.5% 40.8%
27 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3% 1995 3/3 1.3 2.0 55.7% 65.2% 42.0% 20.6% 38.1% 55.0% 39.5%
28 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0% 1996 8/8 3.3 2.1 48.1% 76.5% 48.6% 48.0% 47.1% 61.7% 38.6%
29 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8% 1997 9/10 3.1 2.4 50.9% 67.5% 45.5% 56.9% 35.9% 56.5% 40.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/6 2.5 2.0 53.6% 62.8% 45.0% 44.9% 56.5% 54.6% 40.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/1 3.0 2.0 57.1% 55.6% 63.0% 40.0% 50.0% 58.7% 30.0%
Career — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7% — 114/160 2.0 2.6 57.9% 63.3% 47.4% 48.4% 44.1% 56.1% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Gaudenzi Francisco Roig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33 1987 1492 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.09
20 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78 1988 1497 102.9 — — — — +30 +29 — 35.3% -1.24 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.49
21 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04 1989 1568 116.8 — — — — -9 -24 — 51.6% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 +0.31
22 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03 1990 1576 121.2 — — — — — +4 — 40.5% -0.49 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 -0.47
23 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16 1991 1618 122.0 -0.80 +1.99 1.043 50.6% -7 -68 — 43.8% +0.08 5–3 (63%) 0–4 (0%) 101.0 +0.46
24 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21 1992 1575 122.8 -4.12 +2.66 0.979 49.5% +19 -28 — 46.5% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 +1.93
25 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59 1993 1505 109.0 -6.11 +0.15 0.784 44.8% +80 -17 — 32.6% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 +0.92
26 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05 1994 1543 125.5 -1.57 +0.49 0.959 49.3% — +9 — 47.4% -0.37 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 +0.51
27 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07 1995 1502 100.8 -0.70 -2.04 0.879 47.2% — — — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — +0.25
28 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26 1996 1562 128.5 +0.51 +1.03 1.008 50.1% — +13 — 50.0% -0.22 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.33
29 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55 1997 1535 113.7 -1.87 +0.08 0.929 48.6% — +45 — 36.4% -0.73 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.66
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1575 120.4 -1.17 +2.16 0.883 47.2% +3 — — 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1564 103.9 -1.07 -1.82 0.727 44.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.09
Career — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02 — 1715 127.0 -2.81 +1.39 0.943 48.7% +20 -9 — 42.6% -0.42 23–32 (42%) 20–24 (45%) 100.0 +2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.