H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Gaudenzi vs Javier Sanchez H2H: 1-3
Javier Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Javier Sanchez leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1996 San Marino fourth round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1996* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1995* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1993* | Athens | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-4 (ret.) | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1993* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Gaudenzi | Javier Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 |