H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andreas Beck vs Jan Hajek H2H: 0-1
Jan Hajek holds a 1–0 lead over Andreas Beck in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hajek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Hajek won the 2010 Hamburg second round 6-3 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2010* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Jan Hajek | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Andreas Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Beck | #1,283 | #33 | 1,115 | 1,754 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Beck | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #336 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #446 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |