H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andreas Beck vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-0
Andreas Beck holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andreas Beck leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andreas Beck won the 2010 Halle fourth round 6-2 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 40
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2010* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Andreas Beck | 6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2009* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andreas Beck | 1-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Beck | #1,283 | #33 | 1,115 | 1,754 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Beck | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #336 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2009 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #39 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2010 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #446 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |