H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 2-1
Andreas Haider-Maurer holds a 2–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andreas Haider-Maurer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Haider-Maurer won the 2015 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2015* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andreas Haider-Maurer | 6-1 6-0 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andreas Haider-Maurer | 3-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2012* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |