H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Andreas Haider-Maurer holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andreas Haider-Maurer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Haider-Maurer won the 2015 Umag third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Thomas Fabbiano | 6-3 6-2 | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2015* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andreas Haider-Maurer | 6-3 6-4 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Haider-Maurer | #486 | #47 | 946 | 1,749 | 39 | 74 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #119 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #112 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #63 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |