H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andreas Seppi vs Daniel Brands H2H: 2-1
Andreas Seppi holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2013 Basel third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2013* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 7-5 6-4 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2012* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-4 7-6(1) | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Seppi | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |