H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Andreas Seppi vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 2-0
Andreas Seppi holds a 2–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2016 Sofia fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-2 6-1 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2009* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 6-7(5) 6-2 7-6(1) | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreas Seppi | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |