H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Carlos Costa H2H: 2-2

Andrei Chesnokov and Carlos Costa are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 2–1 on clay, while Carlos Costa leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1993 Stockholm Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Carlos Costa
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 27, 1993* Stockholm Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Carlos Costa #30 6-3 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #26 Match data
May 28, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Carlos Costa #50 6-3 6-2 6-4 Andrei Chesnokov #31 Match data
May 5, 1993* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #74 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) Carlos Costa #23 Match data
Apr 13, 1990* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #20 6-4 6-0 Carlos Costa #164 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Carlos Costa #1,297 #10 1,663 1,960 237 201 54.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Carlos Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #243 1,524 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1989 2–5 28.6% #201 1,512 0 0
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1990 6–8 42.9% #151 1,554 0 0
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1991 15–13 53.6% #55 1,659 0 0
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1992 39–21 65.0% #14 1,761 0 2
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1993 42–23 64.6% #26 1,872 0 4
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1994 35–26 57.4% #27 1,675 0 6
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1995 29–22 56.9% #31 1,756 0 6
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1996 25–24 51.0% #61 1,659 0 6
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1997 20–23 46.5% #56 1,629 0 6
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1998 21–24 46.7% #67 1,570 0 6
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1999 1–10 9.1% #472 1,474 0 6
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —