H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Andrei Chesnokov vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 4-0

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 4–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1992 Bordeaux third round 6-2(2) 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Chesnokov
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 17, 1992* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #37 6-2(2) 7-6 Emilio Sanchez #24 Match data
Mar 8, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Andrei Chesnokov #36 7-5 7-5 Emilio Sanchez #10 Match data
May 20, 1990* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #15 6-7 6-4 7-6 Emilio Sanchez #8 Match data
Apr 29, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #20 4-6 6-1 7-6 Emilio Sanchez #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,038 402 272 59.6% 0 1 0 0 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Chesnokov Emilio Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,545 0 0
20 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,668 0 0
21 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,841 0 3
22 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7
23 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4 1988 39–19 67.2% #17 1,907 0 8
24 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,871 0 9
25 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,812 0 11
26 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,823 0 14
27 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7 1992 40–25 61.5% #21 1,783 0 15
28 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,686 0 15
29 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,628 0 15
30 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,587 0 15
31 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15
32 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15
33 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7 — — — — — — —